Rolex GMT-Master 2 Root Beer SS/RG 126711 CHNR by ARF factory
ARF is regarded as a top-tier watchmaking factory, known for producing high-end replica watches. This is why I chose their Rolex GMT-Master II Root Beer SS/RG 126711 CHNR for review, confident that it wouldn’t disappoint me. I will discuss the flaws and share my thoughts. Seller details will be provided at the end of this review. Let’s get started!
Movement
The VR3235 is a hybrid movement used in high-quality replica Rolex watches, combining features from the Rolex 3135 and 3235 movements. It has a power reserve of around 40 hours, making it less durable than the genuine 3235 movement. While reliable for a replica, it isn’t fully compatible with genuine Rolex parts. The movement is affordable, often available for around $100, and is popular in the replica market for its decent accuracy and performance.
Flaw 1
The rose gold color on the ARF watch appears darker than the authentic by a few shades. This may be due to lighting, as the exposure in both images is different, but it’s still worth noting.
Flaw 2
The font on the dial is slightly thinner on the ARF watch compared to the authentic, and this applies to the crown as well. This is a minor flaw, as most wouldn’t notice the difference without an authentic piece for side-by-side comparison.
Flaw 3
A similar discrepancy is observed in the font at the bottom of the dial, which is noticeably thinner on the ARF. The color of the font also slightly differs between the two watches.
Flaw 4
Referring to the number 4, the numbers engraved on ARF’s bezel appear elongated compared to the authentic. This elongation affects only a few numbers, which is fortunate.
Flaw 5
Focusing on the bottom of the dial, ARF’s crown print is slightly thicker than the authentic, and the positioning is slightly off. The “A” character seems to be floating, and their font size is inconsistent.
Flaw 6
The red color on both bezels differs by a few shades, with ARF’s red being darker, possibly due to lighting issues.
Flaw 7
The rehaut on the ARF is decent, but the font thickness could be increased a bit compared to the authentic. This is a minor flaw, as their rehaut is difficult to call out without an authentic piece for comparison.
Flaw 8
The Rolex logo engraving on the clasp differs in position and prominence. ARF’s engraving has a solid outline compared to the authentic, but overall, it is considered decent and a minor flaw.
Conclusion
ARF’s Rolex GMT-Master II Root Beer SS/RG 126711 CHNR is a solid piece, and all identified flaws are minor. The only significant improvement would be in matching the rose gold color more closely. I am eager to explore this watch further in a more detailed review. You can support my work by subscribing to my YouTube channel or donating. As always, peace out and stay vibey.