Rolex GMT MASTER II 126710 GRNR (Bruce Wayne) by Clean factory
Clean Factory is one of the best, if not the best, factories in the replica community for producing solid true clone movements and Rolex watches. I have high expectations for their Rolex GMT MASTER II 126710 GRNR and hope it lives up to the hype. The seller will be referenced at the end of this review. Can’t wait, let’s get started!
Movement
Clean is using the DD3285 movement for their Rolex GMT MASTER II 126710 GRNR, which surpasses the SH3285 (Shanghai). This movement is a true clone that can be swapped out with genuine parts. The genuine 3285 movement has a power reserve of 70 hours, and Clean’s DD3285 matches this. The DD3285 movement includes the GMT module, ensuring the stability and power reserve are as reliable as always. Lastly, the DD3285 movement is exclusive to Clean Factory.
Measurements
Authentic Case Diameter: 40MM || Clean Case Diameter: 40MM
Authentic Thickness: 11.9MM || Clean Thickness: 12MM
Flaw 1
The rehaut alignment is off on the Clean watch, as seen by the crown engraving. This is somewhat disappointing, but the engraving is still prominent. Hopefully, Clean Factory can fix this issue, as they are considered a top-tier watch maker in the replica community.
Flaw 2
Point 1: The silver bezel outline on Clean’s hour markers and hands is similar to the genuine but differs in reflectiveness by a few shades.
Point 2: Clean’s “GMT-MASTER II” text is dull compared to the genuine.
Point 3: The “superlative chronometer officially certified” text is wonky on Clean’s dial, which is common and expected among top-tier watches.
Point 4: The gray color on the bezels differs, with Clean’s gray being a few shades darker than the genuine.
Point 5: The “Rolex” and “Oyster Perpetual Date” texts differ in font size, with Clean’s font being slightly thinner than the genuine.
Point 6: The authentic date font is serif, while Clean’s date font is sans-serif, a common flaw among top-tier batches. This issue has also appeared in other top-tier factory watches.
Flaw 3
Before mentioning this flaw, please consider it a nitpick. Clean’s lug is slightly thicker than the genuine, which bothers me a little. Does it bother you too, even though it’s a minor flaw?
Flaw 4
Clean’s Rolex logo cutout on the clasp isn’t as perfect as the genuine. Moreover, the edges of Clean’s Rolex logo aren’t refined.
Flaw 5
Clean’s Rolex logo engraving on the inner clasp differs from the genuine. Clean’s engraving is too thin, and the engraving method differs from the genuine. The genuine engraving doesn’t have an outline, but Clean’s does.
Flaw 6
The engravings on the movement plates differ, as seen in the “3285” and “GENEVA SWISS” texts. Clean’s engravings differ from the genuine in terms of color, depth, and size. However, it is one of the best I have seen so far, and no other factory comes close. The metal finishes also differ on all the movement plates.
Conclusion
Clean’s Rolex GMT MASTER II 126710 GRNR 2024 is a solid watch despite the flaws. My main concerns are the rehaut alignment and the font reflectiveness on the dial. Flaws that aren’t visible to the naked eye aren’t significant, but Clean Factory does pay attention to them, though there is still room for improvement. I hope Clean Factory takes note of this blog review and fixes the mentioned flaws. I love the classic colorway of this GMT-MASTER II, and the nickname “Bruce Wayne” is perfect for it. As always, peace out and stay vibey.